Search the NCPE Web Site Google Custom Search

Click here to become an NCPE Member

NCPE Town Hall Meeting

Join us on June 28, 2008 for the Third NCPE Town Hall Meeting.

NCPE in the News: 2008

"Court Hopeful Says Consultant Pitched Deal" (Las Vegas Review Journal)

"Given $50,000 He Decides to Run" (Las Vegas Sun)

Acting President Julie Tousa on Jon Ralston's "Face to Face: Ethics Complaint"

Meet the Acting President of NCPE, Julie Tousa

"New Watchdog of Public Ethics Continues Enforcing Vital Unwritten Law" (Las Vegas Review Journal)

"Partying Away As Taxpayers Pay and Pay" (Las Vegas Sun)

Ethics Legislation 2007

NCPE at the 2007 Nevada State Legislature: Summary and Details

"Article 6 Commission" to study and recommend improvements in the Nevada judiciary
See Dr. Craig Walton's summary of May Meeting

NCPE statement about the danger of big donors contributing to Supreme Court justice election campaigns.

Judicial Ethics & the Complaint Processes

Craig Walton's letter, to the Las Vegas Business Journal in favor of the new plan for judicial selection

Candidate Pledge

 

box 3

Email NCPE Treasurer

News NCPE at NV Legislature - 2007 Proposals

 

NCPE 2007 Ethics Legislation Proposals

NRS 281.559  and 281.561

            (1)  Public Officials Disclosure (Appointed: NRS 281.559; Campaigning and Elected, 281.561) :

Rationale:
By national standards, Nevada=s current disclosure provisions lack detail and are not reported in a manner enabling timely review. On Oct. 7, 2006, the RJ reported that ANevada gets an F grade on disclosure statements@ from the Center for Public Integrity, which compared us to the other 49 states. We need full disclosure of relevant details so as to enable Nevada=s citizens to judge whether or to what extent an official=s commitment in a private capacity does or does not jeopardize independence of judgment.

BDR:
Require monthly reports of gifts (at NRS 281.481) and of financial disclosure (at NRS 281.559 & .561). In addition, the level of financial disclosure by public officials should include, but not be limited to, the items listed below:

Job title w/the entity         not now required
employer description,         A
value range or income amt,         A
officer/director information,        A
officer/dir.         Not sufficiently narrowly defined
officer/dir. Entity name         not now required
officer/dir. Entity description         A
spouse officer/director info.         A
Investment entity description         A
investment entity investment value,         A
Client information,         A
client name         A
client value/range,         A
spouse client information,         A
real property value/range,         A
spouse real property information,         needs greater detail, specifics
spouse and dependents over 18,         not now required
state auditing authority over these forms,         A
state routinely reviews forms for accuracy,         ADD THIS REQUIREMENT
state publishes list of delinquent filers,         ADD THIS REQUIREMENT
leadership positions in other organizations         ADD THIS REQUIREMENT

(1a). Penalties:
Rationale: Currently penalties are weak and are often waived, so that disclosure is too often treated as an optional or minor part of one=s responsibilities. But in the larger culture of lobbyists and so-called >contributions=, when disclosure itself is not yet an established practice, the penalties need to be adequate to change everyone=s perception to the view that this responsibility is to be taken seriously, records are to be kept and reporting is to be timely and made public. Penalties must be known and enforced for violating limits or deadlines of disclosure laws.

BDR : Regarding gifts (at NRS 281.481) and financial disclosure (at NRS 281.559 & .561), first violation $1000; doubling for second and doubling again for third violations, to be enforced by Secretary of State.

Continue reading 2007 proposals

NRS 218.900-944:
(1) Add Requirement that LLCs (limited liability corporations) list their partners
(2). Lobbyist Disclosure Changes

NRS 281.421 and 281.501: Remove the proportionality exception to Conflict of Interest Disclosure:

NRS 281.465 : Allow a county to have an ethics law which is more restrictive

NRS 281.481:
(1) Public Officials Reporting of Gifts
(2) Close the loophole in NRS 281.481.1:

NRS 281.501
(1) What comes after abstaining.
(2) Editorial Revision
(3) Failure of consistency in the language about seeking gifts

NRS 281.551 (6) & NRS 281.4375:
Replace definition of willful

NRS 281.559 and 281.561:
(1) Public Officials Disclosure (Appointed: NRS 281.559; Campaigning and Elected, 281.561)

NRS 281.561
(2) Campaign contribution Reporting
: