Search the NCPE Web Site Google Custom Search

Click here to become an NCPE Member

NCPE Town Hall Meeting

Join us on June 28, 2008 for the Third NCPE Town Hall Meeting.

NCPE in the News: 2008

"Court Hopeful Says Consultant Pitched Deal" (Las Vegas Review Journal)

"Given $50,000 He Decides to Run" (Las Vegas Sun)

Acting President Julie Tousa on Jon Ralston's "Face to Face: Ethics Complaint"

Meet the Acting President of NCPE, Julie Tousa

"New Watchdog of Public Ethics Continues Enforcing Vital Unwritten Law" (Las Vegas Review Journal)

"Partying Away As Taxpayers Pay and Pay" (Las Vegas Sun)

Ethics Legislation 2007

NCPE at the 2007 Nevada State Legislature: Summary and Details

"Article 6 Commission" to study and recommend improvements in the Nevada judiciary
See Dr. Craig Walton's summary of May Meeting

NCPE statement about the danger of big donors contributing to Supreme Court justice election campaigns.

Judicial Ethics & the Complaint Processes

Craig Walton's letter, to the Las Vegas Business Journal in favor of the new plan for judicial selection

Candidate Pledge

 

box 3

Email NCPE Treasurer

News NCPE at NV Legislature - 2007 Proposals

 

NCPE 2007 Ethics Legislation Proposals

NRS 281.465 
1.  Re-introduce the part of 2005's original [not the later-amended version] AB530 which allows a county to have an ethics law which is more restrictive than the state law on the same issue, where either it agrees to enforce that restriction or the State insists on such jurisdiction.
            Rationale:
Some statewide provisions are vague or loose in wording, in order to allow a wide variety of situations. Local jurisdictions should be allowed to adopt more specific and more restrictive rules if needed, and to rely on the neutral authority of the Nevada Commission on Ethics for enforcement. For instance, local governments might want to limit the value of gifts allowed, or the length of cooling-off periods.

BDR:
1 Sec. [?]  NRS 281.465 is hereby amended to read as follows:
2 281.465 1. The Commission has jurisdiction to investigate
3 and take appropriate action regarding an alleged violation of:
4 (a) [This] Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, this
5 chapter by a public officer or employee or former public officer or
6 employee in any proceeding commenced by:
7 (1) The filing of a request for an opinion with the
8 Commission; or
9 (2) The Commission on its own motion.
10 (b) NRS 294A.345 or 294A.346 in any proceeding commenced
11 by the filing of a request for an opinion pursuant thereto.
12 (c) Ethical standards adopted by a governing body of a county
13 or an incorporated city pursuant to NRS 281.541 by an elected
14 public officer of the county or city, upon the filing of a request for
15 an opinion by the governing body, if the Commission:
16 (1) Determines that the ethical standards adopted by the
17 governing body do not conflict with, and are more restrictive than,
18 the provisions of this chapter; and
19 (2) Agrees to investigate and take appropriate action [or agrees to allow that county or city body to enforce its own regulation].
20 2. The provisions of paragraph (a) of subsection 1 apply to a
21 public officer or employee who:
22 (a) Currently holds public office or is publicly employed at the
23 commencement of proceedings against him.
24 (b) Resigns or otherwise leaves his public office or employment:
25 (1) After the commencement of proceedings against him; or
26 (2) Within 1 year after the alleged violation or reasonable
27 discovery of the alleged violation.
28 3. If the Commission investigates an alleged violation of the
29 ethical standards of a county or city by an elected public officer
30 pursuant to paragraph (c) of subsection 1, the Commission:
31 (a) May not investigate the alleged violation by the elected
32 public officer to determine whether the elected public officer
33 violated any provision of this chapter; and
34 (b) May impose any civil penalty authorized pursuant to NRS
35 281.551 upon the elected public officer if the Commission finds a
36 violation of the ethical standards of the county or city.

 

Continue reading 2007 proposals

NRS 218.900-944:
(1) Add Requirement that LLCs (limited liability corporations) list their partners
(2). Lobbyist Disclosure Changes

NRS 281.421 and 281.501: Remove the proportionality exception to Conflict of Interest Disclosure:

NRS 281.465 : Allow a county to have an ethics law which is more restrictive

NRS 281.481:
(1) Public Officials Reporting of Gifts
(2) Close the loophole in NRS 281.481.1:

NRS 281.501
(1) What comes after abstaining.
(2) Editorial Revision
(3) Failure of consistency in the language about seeking gifts

NRS 281.551 (6) & NRS 281.4375:
Replace definition of willful

NRS 281.559 and 281.561:
(1) Public Officials Disclosure (Appointed: NRS 281.559; Campaigning and Elected, 281.561)

NRS 281.561
(2) Campaign contribution Reporting
: